Cases 1 - 10 of 70
CHENG v. BENTON et al
as 2:2024cv06567
Plaintiff:
JIA CHENG
Defendant:
ROBERT BENTON, JOHN J. BROWN, HAO (KEVIN) CHEN and others
SIPOS v. DIGESTIVE CARE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv23137
Plaintiff:
PAUL SIPOS
Defendant:
DIGESTIVE CARE, INC., TIBOR SIPOS, SR., JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
NELSON v. SCHULMAN et al
as 3:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN NELSON
Defendant:
DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, JOHN D. RAINEY, RODNEY C. ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
ISRAEL v. PROVENTION BIO, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv01861
Plaintiff:
M.D. ROBERT ISRAEL
Defendant:
PROVENTION BIO, INC., ASHLEIGH PALMER, AVERY CATLIN and others
DESALVO v. COSTA et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
ISSAC DESALVO
Defendant:
PAULO COSTA, JANET DILLIONE, GREG DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
GARY SCHADER v. THERO et al
as 3:2022cv02017
Plaintiff:
Gary Schader, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Amarin Corporation PLC and GARY SCHADER
Defendant:
John F. Thero, Michael W. Kalb, Lars G. Ekman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HOY v. HOY et al
as 1:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. HOY
Defendant:
JOHN J. HOY, III, JOHN J. HOY JR. AND JEANETTE N. HOY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and HOYS HOLLY HILL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
HARAZEEN v. PALMER et al
as 3:2021cv18228
Plaintiff:
AHMED HARAZEEN
Defendant:
ASHLEIGH PALMER, ANDREW DRECHSLER, JEFFREY BLUESTONE and others
LIBERATORE v. PALMER et al
as 3:2021cv14636
Plaintiff:
SAURO LIBERATORE
Defendant:
ASHLEIGH PALMER, ANDREW DRECHSLER, JEFFREY BLUESTONE and others
PALEMPALLI v. PATSALOS-FOX et al
as 2:2021cv12025
Plaintiff:
VISWANATHA PALEMPALLI
Defendant:
GORDON J. COBURN, LEO S. MACKAY, JR., ROBERT E. WEISSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
