Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Benjamin Solomon el al. v. Douglas Hirsch et al
as 2:2024cv04301
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Solomon
Defendant:
Douglas Hirsch, Trevor Bezdek, Karsten Voermann and others
Himmelberger v. Kiani et al
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dianne Himmelberger
Defendant:
Joe Kiani, Micah Young, Bilal Muhsin and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
McClellan v. Masimo Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Linda McClellan
Defendant:
Masimo Corporation, Joe Kiani, Micah Young and others
Gera v. Bhavsar et al
as 4:2023cv04423
Defendant:
Stem, Inc., Denish Bhavsar, Star Peak Energy Transition Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
REYNOLDS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED 04/08/2015, v. Schwab et al
as 4:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED
Defendant:
Charles R. Schwab, Walter W Bettinger, II, Peter Crawford and others
Not Classified By Court:
The Charles Schwab Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Gonzalez v. Kemp et. al
as 3:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Adonis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Astra Space, Inc., Chris C. Kemp, Kelyn Brannon and others
Intervenor:
Dean William Drulias
Woodward v. Gormsen et al
as 3:2022cv03419
Plaintiff:
Brodie Woodward
Defendant:
Christian Gormsen, Joshua Makower, Douglas J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Grant Smith v. Brian Mariotti et al
as 2:2022cv03155
Plaintiff:
Grant Smith
Defendant:
Brian Mariotti, Russell Nickel, Andrew Perlmutter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Gonzales v. Adams et al
as 3:2021cv05197
Plaintiff:
Joselito Gonzales, and Joselito Gonzales
Defendant:
Adrian Adams, Richard Afable, Mark G Edwards and others
Neesha Patel v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03671
Plaintiff:
Neesha Patel and Wayne Geist
Defendant:
Stephen Lesieur, Adam Karol, Gregory Mondre and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
