Stockholders Suits Cases filed in Oregon
Fuhs et al v. Ahn et al
as 3:2015cv01465
Defendant: Mark J. Ahn, William Ashton, Richard Chin and others
Plaintiff: David W. Fuhs and Harold Spradling
Amicu: Galena Biopharma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Nelson v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv00958
Defendant: Nicole Gelpi and John W. Williams
Plaintiff: Erik D. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Klein v. Ahn et al
as 3:2014cv00516
Defendant: Mark J. Ahn, William Ashton, Richard Chin and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Davis et al v. Cascade Tanks LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02119
Defendant: Balusa Holdings, Inc., Cascade Companies LLC, Cascade Tanks LLC and others
Plaintiff: William Davis and W.M.D. Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plumbers Local No. 137 Pension Fund et al v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00633
Defendant: Bradley F. Copeland, Raymond P. Davis, Ronald L. Farnsworth and others
Plaintiff: Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund and Plumbers Local No. 137 Pension Fund
Interested Party: Umpqua Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Sweet et al v. Ellingsen Family Trust 9/28/04 et al
as 6:2009cv06229
Plaintiff: Alfred William Sweet, Evelyn L. Sweet, A.W. Sweet IRA and others
Defendant: Ellingsen Family Trust 9/28/04, Kerry K. Killinger, Stephen Rotella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Defendant
Scheets v. Holmes et al
as 3:2007cv01147
Plaintiff: Randall Scheets
Defendant: William Holmes, Russ Royer and Holmes Royer, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?