Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Lizcano v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Collette Lizcano
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_claimant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Collette Lizcano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas v. Sabre et al
as 1:2011cv03899
Plaintiff:
Derrick Douglas
Defendant:
James Sabre, Chase Bank and Valencia Terrall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comer v. J P Morgan Chase Bank, N A
as 4:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
MELANIE COMER
Defendant:
J P MORGAN CHASE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Briceland v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2011cv02063
Plaintiff:
Mojdeh Briceland
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv01450
Plaintiff:
Joi Watts
Defendant:
John Doe, George Reed, JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 5:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris and Rhonda Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holyfield v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 3:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Evander Holyfield
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank , Stewart Title Guaranty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dees et al v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 3:2010cv00045
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Claire Dees and Mark Dees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sampson
as 1:2010cv01666
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Rodney D. Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Parker et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 3:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Scott Parker , Carol Parker and The Carol Parker Living Trust
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
