Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Graham Engineering Corp. v. Johnson
as 1:2016cv02522
Plaintiff:
Graham Engineering Corp.
Defendant:
Doug Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Graham Enginerring Corp. v. Schilke
as 1:2016cv02526
Plaintiff:
Graham Engineering Corp.
Defendant:
Daniel Schilke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham Engineering Corp. v. Slusarz
as 1:2016cv02527
Plaintiff:
Graham Engineering Corp.
Defendant:
Kevin Slusarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham Engineering Corporation v. Deceuninck North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02467
Plaintiff:
Graham Engineering Corporation
Defendant:
Deceuninck North America, Inc. and Deceuninck North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham Packaging Company, L.P. v. Transplace Texas, LP
as 1:2015cv01186
Plaintiff:
Graham Packaging Company, L.P.
Defendant:
Transplace Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE GRAHAM COMPANY v. KEITH et al
as 2:2014cv06128
Plaintiff:
THE GRAHAM COMPANY
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH and LOCKTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH v. THE GRAHAM COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04969
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KEITH
Defendant:
THE GRAHAM COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GGNSC PHILADELPHIA LP et al v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2013cv03020
Plaintiff:
GGNSC PHILADELPHIA LP , GGNSC PHILADELPHIA GP, LLC , GGNSC ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLP and others
Defendant:
MARY GRAHAM and BURLEY STITH
Cause Of Action: Petition to Compel/Stay Arbitration under an Insurance Contract
MARBLELIFE, INC. v. SMITH et al
as 2:2011cv07679
Plaintiff:
MARBLELIFE, INC.
Defendant:
JOSEPH SMITH, CONCRETE RESOURCES, INC., PATRICIA COONEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. v. CHRYSALIS MEDISPA et al
as 2:2009cv04628
Plaintiff:
COACTIV CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
Defendant:
CHRYSALIS MEDISPA and DENISE MARIE GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
