Cases 11 - 17 of 17
JAMES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv03049
Plaintiff:
TENISHA JAMES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDLEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02291
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MEDLEY , JOHN MEDLEY , CHRISTINA BENSON and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al v. EV3, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv06306
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS CORPORATION
Defendant:
EV3, INC., RHONDA BARR, ANDREW FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
TROVARELLI v. LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2009cv04963
Plaintiff:
TRICIA TROVARELLI
Defendant:
LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and JOHNSON & JOHNSON PENSION COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LEVINSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03317
Plaintiff:
ERIKA LEVINSON and MARIA WATKINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VERCELLONO et al v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv02350
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA VERCELLONO and DANIEL VERCELLONO
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, HELENE CURTIS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
21st Capital Corp v. 402 Design Group, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv04224
Plaintiff:
21st Capital Corp
Defendant:
402 Design Group, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Latif K Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
