Cases 21 - 27 of 27
United States Gypsum Company v. Tashman Johnson LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
United States Gypsum Company, United States Gypsum Company and United States Gypsum Company
Defendant:
Tashman Johnson LLC and City of Rainier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rainer Economic Development Council v. United States Gypsum Company et al
as 3:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Rainer Economic Development Council and Rainer Economic Development Council
Defendant:
United States Gypsum Company, United States Gypsum Company, United States Gypsum Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
The New Earth Company et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv03051
Plaintiff:
The New Earth Company, The New Algae Company and Cell Tech International, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, Daryl J Kollman, Bruce Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States of America v. Sandquist
as 3:2008cv00455
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cody C. Sandquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3000 Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act
United States of America v. Jones
as 3:2008cv00441
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brenden T. Jones and Sandra A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Debt to US - FHA/HUD Title I
United States of America v. Get More Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00987
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Get More Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bronaugh Investors Oregon, Limited Partnership v. Bakke Property Management et al
as 3:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Bronaugh Investors Oregon, Limited Partnership and Bakke Property Management
Defendant:
Oregon Housing and Community Services, State of Oregon, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
