Other Contract Cases filed in Oregon
Cutler et al v. White et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01692
Defendant: Kevin T Caiassio, Hartman Wright Project Management, John and Jane Does 1 -10 and others
Plaintiff: Robert Cutler and Nancy Cutler
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
City of Albany v. CH2M Hill, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant: CH2M Hill, Inc.
Plaintiff: City of Albany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hill v. Bank of America N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00745
Defendant: Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff: Jason Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jacobsen Construction Company et al v. Westmont Construction, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00310
Plaintiff: Jacobsen Construction Company and Morgan Hill Senior Living Limited Partnership
Defendant: Westmont Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hill Meat Company v. Sioux-Preme Packing Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01062
Plaintiff: Hill Meat Company
Defendant: Sioux-Preme Packing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hill v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 6:2007cv06076
Plaintiff: Daniel R. Hill
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service, Raymond Luke and Denice Jacot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. v. Tonoloway Tack Drivers, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00042
Plaintiff: Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. and Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Tonoloway Tack Drivers, Inc., Tonoloway Tack Drivers, Inc., Tonoloway Tack Drivers, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Battenfeld Technologies, Inc., Battenfeld Technologies, Inc., Battenfeld Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant: Marshall T. Hill dba Uncle Bud's CSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?