Cases 1 - 10 of 35
McCrary v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 1:2023cv10768
Plaintiff:
Margaret McCrary
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Compere v. MTGLQ Investors LP et al
as 1:2023cv04669
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors LP, Selene Finance LP, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marie S Compere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Insta-Care Pharmacy Services Corporation et al v. TN Dyer Op LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Insta-Care Pharmacy Services Corporation d/b/a PharMerica, PMC Healthcare Pharmacies LLC d/b/a PharMerica, Insta-Care Pharmacy Services Corporation doing business as Pharmerica and others
Defendant:
TN Dyer Op LLC d/b/a The Highlands of Dyersburg Health & Rehabilitation, TN Mem Op LLC d/b/a The Highlands of Memphis Health and Rehabilitation, Harborview Jesup, LLC d/b/a Harborview Health Systems of Jesup and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Better Holdco, Inc. v. Pierce
as 1:2022cv09580
Plaintiff:
Better Holdco, Inc.
Defendant:
Sarah J. Pierce and Sarah Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
CECO Environmental Corp., et al v. Pierce Steel Fabricators & Machining, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
CECO Environmental Corp. doing business as Adwest Technologies, Inc and CECO Industrial Solutions, Inc. doing business as Adwest
Defendant:
Pierce Steel Fabricators & Machining, Inc. doing business as Pierce Steel Fabricators, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valelly v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 1:2019cv07998
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sarah VALELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shenzhen Kingdafeng Plastic & Hardware Product Co., Ltd. v. Project Tri-Force LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04022
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Kingdafeng Plastic & Hardware Product Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Project Tri-Force LLC, Tri-Force Sales LLC, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Herrera Virguez et al
as 1:2018cv00606
Interpleader_plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Interpleader_defendant:
Jose Luis Herrera Virguez and Zelhideth del Valle Montano Linares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aurelius Capital Partners LP et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2007cv11327
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelius Capital Partners LP, Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and Blue Angel Capital I LLC
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
Interested Party:
Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A., GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Appellant:
Citibank, N.A. and Administracion Nacional de Seguridad Social
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
NML CAPITAL, LTD.,
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2009cv10620
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Clearstream Banking S.A.
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Securities, Inc. and BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco De La Nacion Argentina, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and ACP Master, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF CORPORATION and Citibank, N.A.
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
