Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mayfield v. 1st National Bank of Bryan, et al
as 4:2018cv03366
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B., FDIC as Receiver of Franklin Bank, SSB, 1st National Bank of Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardwick v. Prosperity Bank
as 4:2016cv02513
Plaintiff:
Joby Hardwick
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hoerman v. Prosperity Bank
as 4:2015cv02189
Plaintiff:
Allen Hoerman
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Prosperity Bank v Bishop
as 4:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Bank
Defendant:
Ross Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DeJarnette v. Prosperity Bank
as 4:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Douglas DeJarnette
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardoni et al v. Prosperity Bank, et al
as 4:2014cv01946
Plaintiff:
Billy Shaffer, Terry Blain, Chris Cardoni and others
Defendant:
Prosperity Bank, Eric Davis and Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prosperity Bank v. Cardoni et al
as 4:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Bank
Defendant:
Christopher Cardoni , Wesley Webb , Terry Blain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Insurance Company as Subrogee for Cal-Maine Foods v. Prosperity Bank et al
as 5:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gloria Flores, Mario Flores, Edwin Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Prosperity Bank v. First United Funding et al
as 4:2011cv01707
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Bank
Defendant:
First United Funding , Corey N. Johnston , Patrick Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. State Bank et al
as 4:2009cv02520
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
State Bank, Prosperity Bank and Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
