Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Copas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Copas
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Harris
as 3:2024cv01399
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
Kamila Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maverick Creek Wind LLC v. Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Maverick Creek Wind L.L.C.
Defendant:
Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
VI(Z)RT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Vi(z)rt, Inc.
Defendant:
3D Storm SARL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Degioanni v. Topco Associates LLC
as 4:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Amy Degioanni
Defendant:
Topco Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horner v. Polymer Machinery Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
David Horner
Defendant:
Polymer Machinery Company, Inc. and Pan Coast Hydraulic Indus. Co. LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Heidi Nay v. Alliance RV, LLC
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Heidi Nay and Heidi Edna Nay
Defendant:
Alliance RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Degioanni v. The Kroger Corporation
as 4:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Amy Degioanni
Defendant:
The Kroger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
H & H Pars Inc v. AutoZone Inc
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
H & H Pars, Inc. doing business as First Choice Auto and H & H Pars Inc doing business as First Choice Auto
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. d/b/a AutoZone, AutoZone Inc doing business as AutoZone and AutoZone Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
