Cases 521 - 530 of 1,411
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. KUNJ INVESTMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05842
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
KUNJ INVESTMENT, INC. and ASHOK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PAK et al
as 2:2015cv05861
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN PAK, EUNICE PAK, CY YONG HONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PATEL
as 2:2015cv05838
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
PRANAV PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. IVS, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05837
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
IVS, LLC and RAJAN SHETH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. NEMETH TRUST, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05751
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
NEMETH TRUST, LLC, AMANAM TRUST, LLC, USUA H. AMANAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC. v. LC STAR INV. CO. et al
as 2:2015cv05598
Plaintiff:
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC.
Defendant:
LC STAR INV. CO., CHUNG KI CHOE and HUNG P. HONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SWAMI HOSPITALITY CORP. et al
as 2:2015cv05614
Plaintiff:
SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SWAMI HOSPITALITY CORP., KIRAN A. PATEL, USHA K. PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. TULSIPOOJA HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05576
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
TULSIPOOJA HOSPITALITY, LLC and JITENDRA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. K.C. ESTATES II, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05515
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
K.C. ESTATES II, LLC, RAKESH KUMAR and MANSUKH KUMAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC. v. KUMAR et al
as 2:2015cv05519
Plaintiff:
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC.
Defendant:
PAWAN KUMAR and PRITI KUMAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
