Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth Bank, Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Golf, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 3 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Donald R. Pope, Unknown Heirs of Polly Ann Fox Jackson, Betty Hall Ishmael and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America v. 12.667 Acres, More or Less, Located in Hancock County, State of Mississippi
as 1:2019cv00550
Defendant:
12.667 Acres, More or Less, Located in Hancock County, State of Mississippi, Janice Lynn Franklin, Andrew Craig Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 5.59 Acres of Land, more or less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 5.59 Acres of Land, more or less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, Jason E. Patterson, Renasant Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, In Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, Glenn E. Mullins and Nancy J. Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over a Total of 7.13 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Marshall County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over a Total of 7.13 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Marshall County, Mississippi, Preston S. Lamm , Michelle E. Lamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. 1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP
Defendant:
1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi, Jo Ann Donald, OLA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Leaf River Energy Center, LLC v. Salt and Water Rights et al
as 3:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Leaf River Energy Center, LLC
Defendant:
Salt and Water Rights, Sara Boteler Bateman, Charles Joseph Becker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.92 Acre of Land, More Or Less, In Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.92 Acre of Land, More Or Less, In Lowndes County, Mississippi and S & E Land Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
USA v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.01 acres of Land, More or Less, in Panola County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 12.01 acres of Land, More or Less, in Panola County, Mississippi and Henry E. Heafner
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
