Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alice A Young Bear, Georgia A Kaulaity and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601 USDA Condemnation
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00937
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alice A Young Bear, Georgia A Kaulaity and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alice A Young Bear, Georgia A Kaulaity and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.16 ACRE AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.38 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 04-H11-00A-030-000 et al
as 3:2019cv00463
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.16 ACRE AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.38 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 04-H11-00A-030-000, Unknown Heirs of Mary A. Kresge, All Unknown Owners and others
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A TEMPORARY NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT OF 0.28 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, et al
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
A TEMPORARY NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT OF 0.28 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP,, Robert John Becker, Edward A. Benkoski and others
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
