Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Haye v. Sewart et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2019cv01645
Defendant:
Helen Henderson, Patricia Poston, Anna Sewart and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Haye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haye v. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP
as 4:2019cv01625
Plaintiff:
Allan Haye
Defendant:
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, in their capacity as substitute trustees and its trustees does 1-50 and McCarthy & Holthus, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv00630
Defendant:
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, on Behalf of Flagstone Lending Group A Non-Existent Utah Corp. and Succesor/Assignee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Allan Haye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haye v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
as 4:2019cv00632
Plaintiff:
Allan Haye
Defendant:
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, on Behalf of Flagstone Lending Group A Non-Existent Utah Corp. and Succesor/Assignee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03823
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Jack Palmer, Kenney Shirey and others
Plaintiff:
Tyanne Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2013-TT2
as 3:2018cv00939
Plaintiff:
Altamease M. Hayes
Defendant:
Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2013-TT2
Counter_claimant:
Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2013-TT2
Counter_defendant:
Altamease M. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nguyen v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00716
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Bank Of America, N.A. and Aneaqua Hayes
Plaintiff:
Phong Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
HAYES, JR. v. BANK OF AMERICA,N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
DARROL HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA,N.A. , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and CORNERSTONE MORTGAGE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
