Cases 11 - 20 of 36
US Bank National Association v. Concepcion Calvillo et al
as 2:2013cv06218
Defendant:
Concepcion Calvillo, Does, Tubrisa Rowin and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association vs. David Craig, et al.
as 2:2013cv05734
Defendant:
David Craig, Does and Jim Poet
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association v. Sterling et al
as 3:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Christopher A. Sterling and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
US Bank National Association, v. Rudulph
as 2:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association,
Defendant:
JoAnne Rudulph
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
US Bank National Association v. Mejia, et al
as 2:2013cv00645
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Alvaro Mejia and Dolores Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
US Bank National Association v. David Craig et al
as 2:2013cv01872
Defendant:
David Craig and Does
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 07-00007, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 01-00007 v. Cheryl Ann Dameron, et al
as 8:2013cv00323
Defendant:
DOES, Cheryl Ann Dameron, Arthur J Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-7, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2001-7
US Bank National Association v. O'Keefe
as 3:2012cv05085
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Gina M. O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US Bank National Association v. Dale S Pearlman et al
as 8:2012cv01455
Defendant:
Does, Dale S Pearlman and Laurie A Pearlman
Interested Party:
Justine Dunn
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association v. Carolyn Doctor et al
as 5:2012cv01308
Defendant:
Carolyn Doctor and Does
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
