Torts to Land Cases
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
RICHARDS et al v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00220
Plaintiff: MARY C. RICHARDS and GREGORY DAVID - FRANCES GIORGI
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA N.A., CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION and SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FROST v. PITE DUNCAN, LLP et al
as 3:2009cv05780
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant: PITE DUNCAN, LLP, WILLIAM L. PATRIDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
TEMPLE v. TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP et al
as 4:2009cv05669
Plaintiff: DENNIS - ROBERT TEMPLE
Defendant: TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP, Peter Kerman, Superior Court of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Real Property None
TEMPLE v. TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP et al
as 1:2009cv02022
Plaintiff: DENNIS - ROBERT TEMPLE
Defendant: TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP, PETER KERMAN, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Real Property None
FROST v. PITE DUNCAN, LLP et al
as 1:2009cv01896
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant: PITE DUNCAN, LLP, WILLIAM L. PATRIDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Type: Real Property None
City and County of San Francisco, by and through it's Port Commission, and People of The State of California v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv03490
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco, by and through it's Port Commission, and People of The State of California and City and County of San Francisco, by and through it's Port Commission, and People of The State of California
Defendant: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?