Tort Product Liability Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 61 - 70 of 509
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03111
Plaintiff: Melinda Smith
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02934
Plaintiff: Claudine Burton
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duberstine v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02955
Plaintiff: Kathleen Duberstine
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dukes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02956
Plaintiff: David Dukes
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Durfey-Coy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02957
Plaintiff: Diana Durfey-Coy
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Einhorn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02959
Plaintiff: Richard Einhorn
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earl v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02958
Plaintiff: David Earl
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eltantawy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02960
Plaintiff: Said Eltantawy
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emeigh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02961
Plaintiff: Perry Emeigh
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hendrix v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02985
Plaintiff: Ronald Hendrix
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?