Cases 11 - 20 of 47
United States of America v. John Doe and Richard Roe
as 3:2015cv01933
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Estate of Victor Stanley Jasniewicz Hnatuk et al
as 3:2015cv01090
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Estate of Victor Stanley Jasniewicz Hnatuk, Lisabeth Helen Jasniewicz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Vega-Natal et al
as 3:2015cv01093
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Virginia Vega-Natal, Estate of Angel Luis Osorio-Sanchez, Luis Angel Osorio-Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Martinez-Martinez et al
as 3:2015cv01089
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jorge Santiago Martinez-Martinez, Elvira Manso-Rojas, Conjugal Partnership Martinez-Manso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2015cv01037
Respondent:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. John Doe, et al
as 3:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America and John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States v. Doe, et al
as 3:2013cv01898
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. John Doe, et al.
as 3:2013cv01668
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) v. John Doe, et al
as 3:2013cv01661
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
