Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Anderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Clason et al
as 2:2016cv01914
Defendant:
Matthew Clason, Nevada Association Services, Inc., Nevada Sandcastles, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Tierra De Las Palmas OA et al
as 2:2015cv01146
ThirdParty Defendant:
Absolute Collection Services, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Unknown:
Matthew I Knepper and Matthew I Knepper
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Counter Claimant:
SFR Investments Pool I, LLC
Defendant:
SFR Investments Pool I, LLC and Tierra De Las Palmas OA
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Tierra De Las Palmas OA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Starks v Barber, et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
Bert Barber, Andy Chu, First American Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rena' E. Starks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Curitti et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv01467
Defendant:
CJT Financial Group and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Maria Curitti and Matthew Curitti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Curitti et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00442
Defendant:
CJT Financial Group and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Maria Curitti and Matthew Curitti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tonkin et al v. CTX Mortgage Company, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00270
Defendant:
Timothy M Bartosh, Todd Brachtenbach, CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Laurie Mclelland and Matthew R. Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
