Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Lawrence v. MetLife Home Loans et al
as 1:2024cv02686
Plaintiff:
Joan Lawrence
Defendant:
METLIFE HOME LOANS, A division METLIFE Bank, N.A., Champion Mortgage Company, Inc., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Rattner v. 1809 Brickell, LP. et al
as 1:2021cv23426
Plaintiff:
Sherman Rattner
Defendant:
1809 Brickell, LP., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Ehdoc Stanley Axlrod Tower Charitable Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Coleman-Toll Limited Partnership v. Administration for Community Living, et al.
as 2:2015cv02148
Defendant:
Administration for Community Housing and Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Coleman-Toll Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Cheswold (TL). LLC v. The Cambridge Group, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Cheswold (TL), LLC
Defendant:
The Cambridge Group, LLC, Community Action Council for Lexington-Fayette, Bourbon, Harrison and Nicholas Counties, Inc. , Unknown Occupants of 1902 Cambridge Drive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LN Management LLC Series 5271 Lindell v. Estate of Anne Piacentini et al
as 2:2015cv00131
Defendant:
Estate of Anne Piacentini, Federal National Mortgage Association and State of Nevada, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Care Financing and Policy
Intervenor:
Federal Housing Finance Agency as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Association
Counter Claimant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Counter Defendant:
Keys Condominium Association and LN Management LLC Series 5271 Lindell
Plaintiff:
LN Management LLC Series 5271 Lindell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
