Cases 151 - 160 of 287
DEGROAT et al v. COOPER et al
as 2:2013cv07779
Plaintiff:
WILBUR C. DEGROAT, III , ARLITTA DEGROAT , LEON DEGROAT and others
Defendant:
SCOTT COOPER, BRAD INGLESBY, RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KINGSTONE-HUNT et al v. HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY PROPCO, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv07625
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KINGSTONE-HUNT and ELIZABETH PICCOLI
Defendant:
HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY PROPCO, LLC, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWBILL et al v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 1:2013cv07479
Plaintiff:
DESMOND NEWBILL , SHAWNA BOYCE and MARY BURTON NEWBILL
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO., CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FOFANAH et al
as 2:2013cv07345
Plaintiff:
LATONIA FOFANAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MYSLINSKA v. SYED
as 2:2013cv07177
Plaintiff:
DAGMAR R. MYSLINSKA
Defendant:
IRFAN SYED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'KEEFE v. WDC MEDIA, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06530
Plaintiff:
JAMES O'KEEFE, III
Defendant:
WDC MEDIA, LLC , MAINJUSTICE.COM, JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 TO 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMERIQUEST BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. v. VROOM
as 1:2013cv06049
Plaintiff:
AMERIQUEST BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
PETER VROOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAHL, M.D. v. FENNES et al
as 2:2013cv06000
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ZAHL, M.D.
Defendant:
SHERA FENNES, GOOGLE, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL v. LAWSON
as 2:2013cv05272
Plaintiff:
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RANDY Y. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATTIPAGLIA v. SILVER et al
as 1:2013cv04992
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. BATTIPAGLIA
Defendant:
HOWARD SILVER and ALAN ABESHAUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
