Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hosage v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Paul J Hosage
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre, Wilkes-Barre City Police Department, Gerald E Dessoye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELICIANO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv01789
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FELICIANO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT MCDONNELL, JR., JEFFREY CUJDIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITCHETT v. JOHN DOE
as 2:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
DEREK FITCHETT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HERBERT et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05129
Plaintiff:
JASON HERBERT, KEVIN HERBERT and MADELINE HERBERT
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WILLIAM GRESS, JR., ROBERT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FORNAH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2008cv01262
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED FORNAH and MOHAMED FORNAH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AMERICAN CORPORATE SOCIETY, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CORPORATE SOCIETY, INC., ANTOINE MAX DENIS, ACS GLOBAK REALTORS, INC. and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (1-20), JANE DOES (1-20), USCIS VERMONT SERVICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2007cv04097
Plaintiff:
TED MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
JANET A. MCNEIL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NANCY SHAHEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEFINNIS et al v. HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO et al
as 2:2007cv03386
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DEFINNIS and MARC A. FRANZONI
Defendant:
HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO and JOHN DOES 1 - 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
