Cases 11 - 20 of 34
ms "Provence" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG et al v. M/V AGAPI S, et al
as 3:2017cv00081
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, Barge CHB 9952, Barge RTI 430 and others
Plaintiff:
FH Bertling Reederei GmbH and ms "Provence" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Johnson v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv16048
Plaintiff:
Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc. , Mitsubishi Corporation , Diamond Star Shipping PTE, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Chem Carriers LLC
as 2:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Johnson, Sr
Defendant:
Chem Carriers LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
LeBlanc v. LA Carriers L.L.C.
as 2:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
Kevin LeBlanc, Jr
Defendant:
LA Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Weeks Marine, Inc. v. COSCO Bulk Carrier Co, Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv01169
Plaintiff:
Weeks Marine, Inc.
Defendant:
COSCO Bulk Carrier Co, Ltd. and He Hua Hai
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Mayfield v. LA Carriers, LLC
as 2:2014cv02548
Plaintiff:
Claude Mayfield
Defendant:
LA Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Bartel v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00251
Defendant:
Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc., Amerada Hess Corp., American President Lines, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
William E Bartel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
LA Carriers, LLC v. Five B's Inc.
as 2:2013cv06731
Plaintiff:
LA Carriers, LLC
Defendant:
Five B's, Inc., Beverly G Barrois MV and Total Marine Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0740
Tower v. LA Carriers, LLC
as 2:2013cv06061
Plaintiff:
John Tower
Defendant:
LA Carriers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Kraemer v. Kathryn Rae Towing, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01043
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kraemer
Defendant:
Kathryn Rae Towing, Inc. and Cargo Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Marine Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
