Cases 21 - 30 of 42
v. Transocean Drilling (U.S.A.), Inc. et al
as 2:2010xc01155
Defendant:
Transocean Drilling (U.S.A.), Inc. and BP Marine Ltd
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Padgett v. TransOcean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00359
Defendant:
TransOcean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc., Transocean Offshore U.S.A., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Teri Padgett
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
Duncan et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2010cv00298
Petitioner:
Wayne Paul Duncan and Belinda Duncan
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331 Marine Personal Injury
Borel v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2009cv02799
Plaintiff:
Betty Borel and Betty Borel
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spencer v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 2:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert Spencer and Robert Spencer
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Price v. CCS Energy Services, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv04979
Plaintiff:
Annie Price, Annie Price and Annie Price
Defendant:
CCS Energy Services, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Bordelon Marine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04361
Plaintiff:
Brodgerick Clark
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Inc. and Nabors Offshore Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 2:2008cv03512
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Anderson and Tobu Services, LLC
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clay v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
as 2:2008cv03421
Plaintiff:
Rodney Clay and Rodney Clay
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
In re: Bordelon Marine, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01571
Petitioner:
Bordelon Marine, Inc., Bordelon Marine, Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
