Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Doe v. MSC Cruises S.A et al
as 0:2023cv60368
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
MSC Cruises S.A and MSC Cruises Management (UK) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jane Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. and Park West Galleries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Gardner v. BrandSafway LLC
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Gardner
Defendant:
BrandSafway LLC, BrandSafway Services LLC, Thyssenkrupp Safway, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Doe et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2022cv20684
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nigel Morgan
as 2:2021cv00865
Petitioner:
Nigel Morgan
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Doe et al v. Magical Cruise Company, Limited
as 6:2021cv01566
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY, LIMITED doing business as Disney Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sloat v. Turner
as 1:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Sloat and James Sloat
Defendant:
Chris B. Turner, Napali Riders, Inc. In Personam doing business as Na Pali Riders, M/V Sea Biscuit, O.N. HA-1603-CP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE (J.G.) v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2021cv22124
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (J.G.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE (C.C.) v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv20562
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (C.C.)
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
as 1:2021cv20502
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., A BERMUDA COMPANY d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE and NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. a Bermuda Company doing business as Norwegian Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
