Cases 11 - 20 of 1,096
Rabago v. Mazel
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
William Rabago
Defendant:
Laura Mazel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Im v. Paige
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Hye K Im
Defendant:
Shaquille Paige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Hoang Son Do
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Do v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Hoang Son Do
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sylve v. Uyematsu et al
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Cheyanne Sylve
Defendant:
Carly Rose Uyematsu and Samuel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quiroz v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Quiroz
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Juarez et al v. Harding et al
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Arturo Juarez and Sherry Juarez
Defendant:
Rolland E Harding, Solpac Construction Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Solpac Construction Inc. doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
ZHAO LIQIN
Defendant:
MARTIN JAY MCDANIEL and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Flor v. Goode et al
as 2:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Jesse Argelis Flor
Defendant:
Cal Downey Goode and Meriton, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
