Cases 21 - 30 of 35
WINTERS v. SWANK
as 5:2012cv00341
Plaintiff:
MARLIN A. WINTERS, JR.
Defendant:
JESSICA SWANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITA v. CAMILLI
as 5:2011cv02067
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE S. KEITA
Defendant:
JESSICA CAMILLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry et al v. Marvin et al
as 4:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jessica Curry and Gary Curry
Defendant:
William V Marvin and GILCO Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRIZARRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2010cv02694
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MERCADO IRIZARRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Counter_claimant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Counter_defendant:
JESSICA MERCADO IRIZARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ABOHUNAK et al v. MINUTO et al
as 2:2010cv02172
Plaintiff:
PHADE ABOHUNAK , JESSICA ABOHUNAK and ILONA, INC.
Defendant:
JOSHUA MINUTO and MARK ALLEN AUTO REPAIR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAKAKJY v. BREEN et al
as 2:2010cv00462
Plaintiff:
JESSICA TAKAKJY
Defendant:
JAMES BREEN, YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. and YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lyons et al v. Yarmouth Lumber, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lyons and Sean Lyons
Defendant:
Yarmouth Lumber, Inc. and David Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Beddoe v. Fucetola et al
as 3:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
Theodore Beddoe
Defendant:
Carl Fucetola and Jessica Fucetola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ v. WHITE
as 5:2009cv02268
Plaintiff:
JESSICA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PARRISH et al v. TSANG et al
as 2:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
DAIMON C. PARRISH and JESSICA PARRISH
Defendant:
YAU W. TSANG and JIMMY TSANG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
