Cases 21 - 30 of 51
BROWN v. MICHAEL, et al
as 2:2020cv00520
Defendant:
John Dose 1-10, U.S. INS NNJ, Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Laverne Brown
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
CORNELIUS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv19363
Defendant:
GRACE BROWN, JOHN 1 - 10 DOES, RICHARD ROES and others
Plaintiff:
FERLANDES CORNELIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RENOIS v. BROWN
as 3:2019cv09205
Defendant:
TAYLOR BROWN
Plaintiff:
PIERRE RENOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAHMOUD ASHI, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF MOHAMMED A. ALASHI v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv13038
Defendant:
DENCIL E. BROWN and YRC INC
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ASHI, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF MOHAMMED A. ALASHI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASHI v. BROWN et al
as 3:2018cv13038
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
DENCIL E. BROWN
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ASHI, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF MOHAMMED A. ALASHI and MAHMOUD ASHI
Defendant:
YRC INC and John Timothy ricciardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRISS v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2018cv05604
Plaintiff:
ZORANA CRISS
Defendant:
MICAH RICHARDSON, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and TROY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BROWN v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2017cv06306
Plaintiff:
SHANTEL BROWN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER FERGUSON, CLARK TRANSPORTATION INC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. CITY OF GREENVILLE et al
as 3:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
STACY D BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENVILLE, DOUGLAS RAY CREDLE, HAMMOCKS HATTERAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN et al v. GROVE
as 2:2016cv05160
Plaintiff:
BRENDA BROWN , TYRUS WOODARD and GWENDOLYN KEE
Defendant:
JUANITA G GROVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BROWN v. BEAUDRY et al
as 2:2015cv07128
Plaintiff:
SUSAN M. BROWN
Defendant:
CHAD C. BEAUDRY, GAIL L. BEAUDRY, EFRAIN C. TAIPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
