Cases 41 - 50 of 95
DEERY et al v. COLA et al
as 1:2018cv00725
Defendant:
MEREDITH L. COLA and MICHAEL F. COLA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEERY and DANIELLE DEERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLAUGHTER V. MOYA
as 1:2017cv06767
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE THOMAS SLAUGHTER and ROBERT SLAUGHTER
Defendant:
MARCELINA J. MOYA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIEL v. ANTOINE
as 2:2017cv06358
Plaintiff:
YVELT DANIEL
Defendant:
KEVIN ANTOINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERNANDEZ v. FRANK et al
as 2:2017cv06188
Plaintiff:
LORI FERNANDEZ and DANIELLE CARBALLEIRA
Defendant:
MILTON FRANK , UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION , JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RANAUDO et al v. GEORGES et al
as 2:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS RANAUDO and CHERYL RANAUDO
Defendant:
DANIEL GEORGES, METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN-FORD v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2015cv05336
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN JORDAN-FORD
Defendant:
RAWLEIGH DANIEL SWEARINGEN and A.D. TRANSPORT EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
FLYNN v. CSX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv09115
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLYNN
Defendant:
CSX CORPORATION, CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. , NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
FIELDS v. STEIN et al
as 2:2016cv07607
Plaintiff:
AARKIEAM R. FIELDS
Defendant:
DANIEL STEIN, AEGEAN EXPRESS, INC. and DAVID ST. HILAIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. MARLATT et al
as 2:2016cv05574
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
DANIEL WAYNE MARLATT , KLAPEC TRUCKING CO. and JOHN DOE 1-X AND JANE ROE 1-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. FORSYTHE et al
as 1:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
NELLY E TORRES
Defendant:
DANIEL BRENDAN FORSYTHE and MILLER REFRIGERATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
