Cases 41 - 50 of 133
FINSEL v. HERITAGE et al
as 1:2020cv01865
Plaintiff:
Sandra Finsel
Defendant:
ABC PARTNERSHIP 1-5, XYZ CORPORATION 1-5, David A Heritage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
HILL v. MARROQUIN et al
as 3:2020cv01824
Defendant:
NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD CORPORATION, SANTOS MARROQUIN, AMTRAK and others
Plaintiff:
TYERE HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCMANN v. J.G. COOKS RIVERVIEW INN et al
as 1:2020cv01214
Defendant:
RIVERVIEW INN, ABC PARTNERSHIP 1-5, JANE DOE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
EMILY MCMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIMENEZ v. EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN DOE, EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SANTOS JIMENEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIMENEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv21879
Defendant:
XYZ CORP. 1-10 said names being fictitious, JOHN 1 - 10 DOES, ROLLDIE GEORGES and others
Plaintiff:
MELODY JIMENEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ETHERIDGE v. E F CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv21195
Defendant:
EVANS DELIVERY CORPORATION, EVANS DELIVERY CORPORATION, INC., E F CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TARA ETHERIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. WILTSEY et al
as 1:2019cv19212
Defendant:
GARDA CL ATLANTIC, INC., Joseph Wiltsey, ABC PARTNERSHIP 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEPULVEDA v. PIZZULLO et al
as 2:2019cv16447
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, VITO PIZZULLO, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO A SEPULVEDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLERNAN v. PETRILAK et al
as 1:2019cv14795
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION, PAUL PETRILAK, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. MCCLERNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEALS et al v. WARNER et al
as 1:2019cv13384
Plaintiff:
NUNZIATINA NEALS, MICHAEL NEALS and MICHAEL A. NEALS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ABC PARTNERSHIPS, XYZ CORPORATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
