Cases 81 - 90 of 4,228
ROMMEL v. SCHOLL
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROMMEL
Defendant:
SETH D SCHOLL and SETH D. SCHOLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DEL CARPIO BAZAN v. HUNT et al
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DEL CARPIO BAZAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH D. HUNT, SOUTH SHORE, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
FORD v. ESCALANTE et al
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FORD
Defendant:
EVELIO ESCALANTE, STARK INDUSTRIES and AMAZON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HAYTON v. BRUNO et al
as 1:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY HAYTON
Defendant:
KERVINS BRUNO, UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
JOHNSON v. DEOLIVEIRA et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Defendant:
MARESSA DA SILVA, SERGIO DEOLIVEIRA and MARESSA SILVA
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
KING v. VILLALONDONO
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
LATENYA KING
Defendant:
EDISON ABERTO VILLALONDONO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
KING v. VILLALONDONO
as 1:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
LATENYA KING
Defendant:
EDISON ABERTO VILLALONDONO and GPS CONTRACTOR CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BABUNASHVILI v. STAUB et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
TSOTNE BABUNASHVILI
Defendant:
BRIAN STAUB and LAUREN S. STAUB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KSEPKA v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
IRENE KSEPKA
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DOMINQUE C ISAAC, RITA MORRIALE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ROSA v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO ROSA
Defendant:
TYRESE WADE RICHARDSON and MILTON WADE RICHARDSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
