Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Baugh v. Lynch et al
as 3:2015cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
De Groote v. Walmart Stores, Inc
as 6:2015cv00956
Plaintiff:
Donald E De Groote
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
C.S. v. Price
as 3:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
C.S.
Defendant:
Daniel E. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
P. et al v. Petersen
as 3:2013cv01321
Plaintiff:
E. P. and Jody P.
Defendant:
Robert Gary Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Joubert v. Delamater
as 1:2012cv00209
Defendant:
Anne E. Delamater
Plaintiff:
Christian Joubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01161
Defendant:
Ed, Mr. Acevado, S. Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Carson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 6:2011cv06232
Plaintiff:
Blaine E. Carson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DeVaney et al v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
as 6:2010cv06134
Defendant:
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. DeVaney, Robert T. DeVaney, Mike Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Badden v. State of Oregon
as 3:2009cv00889
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Badden
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Personal Injury
Oil Can Henry International v. Stratton Development Group, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
Oil Can Henry International and Oil Can Henry International
Defendant:
Stratton Development Group, LLC and John E. Stratton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
