Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Nichols v. Buffets, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02444
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nichols
Defendant:
Hometown Buffet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nichols v. Buffets, Inc.
as 2:2011at01316
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nichols
Defendant:
Buffets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conway v. Bressler et al
as 3:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Conway
Defendant:
Janice Bressler and Wendy Devine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. Easley et al
as 2:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Adams
Defendant:
Charles L Easley, Andrew J Paulson, CGLS Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Adams v. Easley et al
as 4:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Adams
Defendant:
Charles L. Easley, Andrew J. Paulson, Etal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franciene Black v. Andrew Joshua Tafoya et al
as 2:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Franciene Black
Defendant:
Does and Andrew Joshua Tafoya
Sellers v. Espresso Roma Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv05666
Plaintiff:
Jay L. Sellers
Defendant:
Espresso Roma Corporation, Sandra Coldiron, Josh Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plager v. Gordon Trucking Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03402
Defendant:
Gordon Trucking Inc., Gordon Trucking Inc. and Elizabeth Andrews
Plaintiff:
Ernest Frank Plager and Ernest Frank Plager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
New Jersey Sand Hill Band of Lenape and Cherokee Indians et al v. State of California et al
as 3:2009cv03553
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Sand Hill Band of Lenape and Cherokee Indians and Ronald Stacey
Defendant:
State of California, Contra Costa County, Superior Court of California County of Contra Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
