Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Darbison et al v. Swearingen, et al
as 2:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Helen Darbison and Ellie Longanecker
Defendant:
Woodlake Care Group LLC Doing business as The Woodlake, Leisure Care, LLC and Michelle Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Darbison et al v. Woodlake Care Group LLC
as 2:2022cv00466
Defendant:
Woodlake Care Group LLC and dba The Woodlake Leisure Care LLC
Plaintiff:
Helen Darbison and Ellie Lonanecker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wagner et al
as 8:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
Guardian Ad Litem AUNDREA CHERYL ROSA WAGNER, Ellie Wagner, LINCOLN WAGNER and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney ANNEE DELLA DONNA, Attorney ERIC J. DUBIN, Attorney Ronald E. Norman Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kathlene Ellis v. Hobby Lobby, Inc.
as 5:2016cv02476
Defendant:
DOES and Hobby Lobby, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harvey Ellis and Kathlene Ellis
Kathlene Ellis v. Hobby Lobby, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08852
Defendant:
DOES and Hobby Lobby, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harvey Ellis and Kathlene Ellis
Daniela Ellis v. Target Corporation, et al
as 2:2016cv00118
Defendant:
Does and Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniela Ellis
Ellis v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Dickson et al
as 2:2014at00883
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Willerup
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
Elly Willerup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartolome v. Lopez et al
as 8:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
D Brian F Bartolome
Defendant:
Andrew Lopez, Ellis, Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
