Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AGUILAR et al v. GIANT FOODS, INC.
as 2:2021cv04226
Plaintiff:
GARRETT AGUILAR and MARTIN AGUILAR
Defendant:
GIANT FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT v. PETZOLD et al
as 5:2014cv07046
Plaintiff:
SARAH GARRETT
Defendant:
NANCY PETZOLD and ERIC PETZOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT et al v. BATH AND BODY WORKS, LLC
as 2:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
JACAREE GARRETT and FELICIA GARRETT
Defendant:
BATH AND BODY WORKS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CUNNINGHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04574
Plaintiff:
SAM BAM CUNNINGHAM , DANNY REECE , KIMBERLY REECE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON et al v. DYER et al
as 2:2012cv04379
Plaintiff:
CARL SIMPSON , ALEXANDER COOPER , CURTIS COTTON and others
Defendant:
HENRY DYER , NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RHETT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03537
Plaintiff:
ERRICT RHETT , EDDIE KENNISON, III , KENDEL SHELLO and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC., RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv03427
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE GARRETT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
JOHN GOLDEN RICHARDS , ADAM DUHE , FRANCES DUHE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VALDES et al v. PURELY WATER, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VALDES and KAREN VALDES
Defendant:
PURELY WATER, INC., ROGER GARRETT and SONJA GARRETT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
