Other Personal Injury Cases filed in Georgia
Weiss v. Sears, Roebuck, and Co.
as 1:2015cv03233
Plaintiff: David Weiss
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck, and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughan v. Southlake Mall, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff: Jerry Vaughan
Defendant: Southlake Mall, L.L.C. , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , General Growth Properties, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cross_defendant: Southlake Mall, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUMPH v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
as 5:2013cv00431
Plaintiff: HENRY W RUMPH
Defendant: SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 4:2013cv00272
Plaintiff: Jacquelyne Lindsey
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughan v. Southlake Mall L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv03335
Plaintiff: Jerry Vaughan
Defendant: Southlake Mall L.L.C. , Sears Holdings Management Corporation and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cross_claimant: Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cross_defendant: Southlake Mall L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. Sears, Roebuck, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00053
Plaintiff: Alvin Allen
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00168
Plaintiff: Zenobia Davis
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel v. Nordictrack Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00108
Plaintiff: Cecil Daniel
Defendant: Nordictrack Inc, Icon Health & Fitness Inc, Sears Roebuck and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Jacobs v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 1:2008cv03253
Plaintiff: Irwin Jacobs
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Company, Sears Holding Management Corporation, J. Miles Reidy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?