Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Duane R. Moore, Jr. v. Riverside Community Hospital et al
as 5:2022cv02240
Plaintiff:
Duane R. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside Community Hospital, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera v. Huntington Hospital et al
as 2:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Defendant:
Huntington Hospital, Doctor Jane Doe and Nurse Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Doe v. Neighborhood Healthcare et al
as 3:2021cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Neighborhood Healthcare, Health Center Partners of Southern California, Netgain Technology, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mm
James Yarusso v. Paul Sucgang et al
as 2:2010cv04693
Defendant:
Greater Los Angeles Veterans Health Care Administration, John and Jane Does and Paul Sucgang, D.O.
Plaintiff:
James N. Yarusso, M.D.
Berry et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2008cv02392
Plaintiff:
Wayne Berry and Karen Berry
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Jane Doe Martin, Anesthesia Service Medical Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mark A Vinzant v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mark A Vinzant
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice Bureau of Prison Victorville, John E Lorincz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Mark A Vinzant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark A Vinzant
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prison Victorville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Mark A Vinzant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mark A Vinzant
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prison Victorville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
