Cases 101 - 110 of 21,474
Walters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Charity Walters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zuniga v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
Rosa M. Zuniga
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zahnle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Zahnle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calderone, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Don Calderone, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ames v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M. Ames
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Stephens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shawver et al. v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Phebe Shawver and Allison Shawver
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Chloette Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Church v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01616
Plaintiff:
John Church
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01617
Plaintiff:
Karen Johns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
