Cases 121 - 126 of 126
EVANS et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv02152
Plaintiff:
JANET EVANS and WILLIAM EVANS, JR.
Defendant:
BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TINKER v. MENU FOODS, INC.
as 1:2007cv01468
Plaintiff:
LINDA TINKER, GAIL BRYAN, SUSAN HANCE-GOODMAN and others
Defendant:
MENU FOODS, INC., CHEMNUTRA, INC. and MENU FOODS INCOME FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EHRHART et al v. SYNTHES (USA) et al
as 2:2007cv01237
Plaintiff:
KERRY EHRHART and WILLIAM EHRHART
Defendant:
SYNTHES (USA), SYNTHES, A.G. and ABC CORPS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAM et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
RONA ADAM, MELANIE ADAM ALLAN, BEVERLEY ADAM FREW and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
WILLIAM H. ENGLISH AND CHERYL R. ENGLISH v. INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00217
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION, ABC CORP., DEF CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. ENGLISH and CHERYL R. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SECHTIN v. REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv00135
Plaintiff:
MARIA L FRYE, ARLENE SECHTIN, CINDY SCIUVA and others
In Re:
HUMAN TISSUE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
CANDY L. JONES, CYNTHIA A. LOWERY, MAX G. LOWERY and others
Defendant:
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., BLOOD and TISSUE CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS and others
Cross Defendant:
PHV J. STEPHEN BENNETT, PHV KELLY S. WITTE, PHV THOMAS G. STAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
