Cases 11 - 20 of 27
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79954
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79956
Plaintiff:
JOHN WESLEY ROGERS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEITER v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79945
Plaintiff:
JOY B HEITER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASHBURN v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79952
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MASHBURN and FRANCES V MASHBURN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEISERT v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79958
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZEISERT
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEGGINSON v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79953
Plaintiff:
PEARL I MEGGINSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79957
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79955
Plaintiff:
OMER D PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79941
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIREY v. THE CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv61184
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. SHIREY, JR.
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORP. , CAREY CANADA, INC. , EAGLE PICHER IND., INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
