Cases 21 - 30 of 107
JONES v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79948
Plaintiff:
ALLENE JONES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKERSON V ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79943
Plaintiff:
RHODNEY W DICKERSON and CAROLYN DICKERSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79950
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LOS SANTOS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79942
Plaintiff:
ISABEL DE LOS SANTOS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79954
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79956
Plaintiff:
JOHN WESLEY ROGERS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEITER v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79945
Plaintiff:
JOY B HEITER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASHBURN v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79952
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MASHBURN and FRANCES V MASHBURN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEISERT v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79958
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZEISERT
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEGGINSON v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79953
Plaintiff:
PEARL I MEGGINSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
