Cases 41 - 50 of 153
DIXON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01214
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY DIXON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01228
Plaintiff:
LOU E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01237
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01223
Plaintiff:
ANNIE TAYLOR
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. JOHN DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2011cv01209
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01231
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HICKS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALTON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01226
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALTON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01235
Plaintiff:
Q.C. JONES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01225
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TURNER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LARRY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01236
Plaintiff:
BOOKER LARRY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
