Cases 41 - 50 of 388
BRAGINTON v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15850
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO.,INC.
Plaintiff:
ELAINE BRAGINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWNING v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15852
Plaintiff:
CAROL BROWNING
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO.,INC. and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVAREZ v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15853
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO.,INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
GUADALUPE ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALDROUP v. MERCK & CO. INC et al
as 3:2018cv15854
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,, MERCK & CO. INC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MARY WALDROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BLOCHER v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15858
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO.,INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLOCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VANHOOSE v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15860
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA VANHOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIN v. MERCK & CO., INC et al
as 3:2018cv15866
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE CAIN
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLS v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15867
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO.,INC.
Plaintiff:
RANDALL NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOHERTY v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15871
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO.,INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOHERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHOWALTER v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 3:2018cv15872
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
JO ANN SHOWALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
