Cases 51 - 60 of 21,455
HEASTON et al v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ESTHER HEASTON and BILL HEASTON
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carmany v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
Peter Carmany
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frelix v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01990
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Frelix
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Land v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
Gerome V. Land
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Berry
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lantry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Lantry
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moses v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Eli Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Eugene Charles Adler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blackerby v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01961
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blackerby
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Laster v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01967
Plaintiff:
Shenell Laster
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
