Cases 1 - 10 of 21,483
Gallegos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gallegos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03262
Plaintiff:
Earl Noland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03296
Plaintiff:
Shawn Griffis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03275
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Astacio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
Julio Astacio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crocker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Barbara Crocker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fansler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03244
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fansler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittington v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03226
Plaintiff:
Richard Whittington
Defendant:
National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henery v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Derek Henery
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooper et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv03198
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cooper and Ashley Cooper
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
