Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Vicki Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03499
Plaintiff:
Zafar Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kip Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022oe03120
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03120
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01773
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller, Jr. v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv01739
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05600
Plaintiff:
Gary Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
