Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28089
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17430
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21385
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00729
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13139
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99277
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04754
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71482
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01391
Plaintiff:
David Wood
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
