Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Palma et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01702
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Palma and James Palma
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06636
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbvie, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00840
Plaintiff:
Laurie M. Daniels
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniele et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv04414
Plaintiff:
Kelly Daniele and Todd Daniele
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spohrer et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv01358
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Caldera Medical Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Spohrer and Marie M. Spohrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pope et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
Lisa Pope and Byron POPE
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alix v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv01456
Plaintiff:
Jean Alix and Philip Alix
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Qualitest Pharmaceuticals and others
Interested Party:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
