Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HURT-FREEMAN v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV et al
as 5:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HURT-FREEMAN
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeman v. Graco, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Freeman
Defendant:
Graco, Inc. and Air Power, Inc.
Freeman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Shirley Freeman and William Freeman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE Stand 'N Seal, Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01804
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Dempsey, James Dieringer, Patricia Kayser and others
Defendant:
Color Caulk Inc., Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Ortec, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
SLR, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cable News Network, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Easy Care Products and Tile Perfect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southern, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01544
Plaintiff:
Artie Southern, Cheryl Wooten, Tonya Moses and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type:
Torts - Injury
Freeman et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00914
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janis Freeman and Kay Moores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Freeman v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01754
Plaintiff:
NORMA JEAN FREEMAN
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bobadilla et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01037
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bobadilla, David Bridges, Robert Carlson and others
Defendant:
Aerofil Technology, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
